Daily Watercolor Day 6

Learning: I’ve never liked when watercolors leave an opaque film over black lines. Not being a watercolorist, I’ve never had to deal with this. But now that I’m practicing, jeeeeeez. Bugs the heck out of me. In the dragon’s mouth above, you can see where the line looks slightly gray. I tried diluting the yellow overlaying the ink, but then the color in the dragon’s face got washed out.

The same thing happened along the dragon’s back. The yellow covered the scales, I attempted to dilute it but ended up making the ink (which I thought was dry) bleed. You can see a slight gray wash there.

I noticed this effect is most pronounced with yellows. Not just that it’s the brightest color but I think there’s something chemical in the pigment that reacts differently over ink. The yellows seem to pool over the black, blues almost avoid it, like there’s a some sort of repellant charge in the pigment’s ions. I’m sure I’ll figure it out. And I am having fun, even if I’m sure my face while painting looked something like this:

Daily Watercolor Day 6 Read More »

Pun Valley Serenade, Now with Extra Wildebeest

Sometime ago, over on Twitter (yes, it’s my first #FromTwitter post!), @FuseEight posted this:

I responded with:

Now, that’s an old pun. I read it in a kids joke book years ago and it’s been hanging around in my head since then. I had enough characters leftover in my tweet to credit it to “traditional” but I thought doing so would diminish the joke. But posting it without credit and leaving the implied possibility that this was my own creation left me feeling icky. So, I did what any other masochist would do, I gave myself a penance: write enough original Chattanooga Choo Choo puns to prove I could have written that one. So, I followed up immediately with:

That felt better. Nougat is great. “Chew-Chews” is charming albeit a bit obvious. So, I pushed it further. This one comes in the form of a fable:

Wait for it…

So, at this point, I’m actually feeling well enough to let it go and a wiser head (@SteveJankousky) gently suggests some prudent bud nipping is in order. Betsy, however, senses there’s yet untapped potential in the phrase.

So I follow with:

You’ll notice a large break between Chatty Newt and Crabby Nudist. Believe it or not, I spent a good portion of those three hours wondering if this next variation was something I wanted to post. It came to me before Crabby Nudist, in fact, but I sat on it for a bit. Here it is:

See, the opening line to Chattanooga Choo Choo is “Pardon me, boy” and I know that “boy” is incredibly loaded. It’s a problematic term, obviously, but in the song, it refers specifically to Pullman Porters. In the late 1800s, George Pullman, head of the Pullman Palace Car Company, hired Black men (and only Black men) to be porters, the stewards of his luxury railway cars. Most of these men were recruited from former slave states in the South and I believe the job was a coveted one. It was a proud position. Being a Pullman Porter gave these men a rare opportunity for employment (and travel). Despite that, the fact that their professional position was called “boy” proves some pretty heavy racism followed them into their new positions.

I wondered if replacing “boy” with “Roy” was disrespectful to the history of Pullman Porters, then I wondered if one can ever reclaim problematic histories with humor (not that this one is mine to reclaim), then I wondered if there’s a measure by which one can (a trauma versus humor graph) and then I finally wondered if I wasn’t just overthinking the whole thing. In the end, I posted it but I felt like the tweet needed an asterisk. So here I am, seventeen months later, adding it.

With your permission, let’s move on.

The next one is the worst of the batch. It requires a very specific type of pop culture knowledge (newspaper comic strips from the 80s) and a very specific cultural experience (cutting out newspaper features and sticking them with magnet to fridges). It piggybacks off the previous pun (reintroducing Roy and newspapers for no good reason) but messes up the premise—why am I rewarding the paper thieving Roy by giving him solid gold fridge magnets?

You could argue that in gags like this, you can reach a saturation point where the stupider the joke, the funnier it becomes (see Norm MacDonald’s Moth joke). But in this case I don’t think it’s dumb enough to be called a good dumb joke. It’s just clumsy. I regret few things in my life but I regret Cathy Nuggets. It did, however, give inspiration for the next pun which might be one of my favorites:

“Soy” felt okay to me, maybe because it’s so far removed from the original, and I really like Catatonic Tofu. I felt this was as good a place as any to wrap it up but not long after logging off, I had one final idea. The next morning, I posted it:

Before I give you that last pun, let’s reflect. What lesson or lessons have we learned today? Well, besides that I’ll take any opportunity to pun it up (the title of this post itself is in reference to the movie that introduced Chattanooga Choo Choo, SUN VALLEY SERENADE), and that I’ll take any opportunity to interrogate a single word’s meaning six ways from Sunday, there’s this: the best part of these jokes, for me, is the set up. Yes, there’s a lot of satisfaction in finding the right alliteration and rhyme to make the pun work but for me the true joy is in the journey. I like the premise that there’s a dating scene for frogs, that there’s a bunch of naked people having their picnic thwarted not by ants or wasps but by a nearby field of blooming flowers, and that there’s a vet somewhere in my neighborhood who sees castrating African megafauna as a routine procedure.

A common piece of advice given to people writing in rhyme is that the rhyme must serve the story (we can talk about whether or not I agree with this in a separate post). I think the same should be said of humor in general and wordplay in particular. So there you go. Today’s lesson: give your puns porpoise.

I wasn’t sure how to end this post. I wanted to write one last Chattanooga pun that would drive the message home but none sprung to mind. I might have had more time to come up with something, but I spent a large part of this weekend at a synagogue with a close Jewish friend. It was lovely but as I observed the services, I was surprised to see in attendance a large number of worshippers who had only recently converted to Judaism. I had expected the congregants to be long-time members and I whispered as much to my friend. Little did I know the rabbi was standing right behind us! I was mortified. But the rabbi smiled kindly and motioned for me to come closer. I leaned in and heard him say, “Pardon me, Goy. Shabbat is now a time for new Jews.”

I’ll be here all week.

Pun Valley Serenade, Now with Extra Wildebeest Read More »

#FromTwitter

One of the reasons I wanted to start up this blog was to find a more permanent home for my art and writing. Twitter has been my main social media platform for the last three years (despite having had an account for the last 13) and it’s been fun, a lot of fun. Twitter’s short format and ephemeral nature. It lends itself to the kind of improvisation I enjoy. That said… the short format, the ephemeral nature. It’s resulted in a body of work—even it it’s just thoughts and ideas—that exists in fragments in a digital never-never, accessible only by scrolling through the archives of a site that is meant to be experienced in the moment.

Phooey on that.

Then, too, there’s the idea that Twitter may suddenly (finally?) implode and in its death throes take with it all those thoughts and ideas. What then? Where shall I go when I want to remember how funny I was on a particular Summer day in 2020? My sweet, sweet witticisms. I will make a home for them here on my blog.

So, to that end, I’m going to drag some things out of Twitter and post them here. When I do, I’ll tag it with #FromTwitter. And so this blog doesn’t just become one big clip show or some kind of sad, nostalgia driven “@JerroldConnors’ Greatest Hits”, I’ll be sure to throw in some extra context.

I also want to say… I’m what? Five posts into this? I’m loving it. I forgot how much I enjoyed blogging back when I did. The ownership of your intellectual property feels different. I like this a lot better. I will admit, looking for and then realizing I’m not getting any like or retweet validation was a shock at first. But now? I like how freeing this feels.

#FromTwitter Read More »

#PBwithJ: THE EMPEROR’S NEW CLOTHES (1998)

I heard you like picture books by celebrities!

Yeah, yeah. I know people love to hate on celebrity-authored books, but I, quite honestly and just for the record, I have no opinion on them. This book, though, stands out in my mind because it had ALL the celebrities. I hadn’t seen it since I thumbed through it at a bookstore in Napa twenty-five years ago and I suddenly wanted to see it again. Thanks to ThriftBooks over on ebay, I was able to pick up a copy.

The story is Hans Christian Andersen’s THE EMPEROR’S NEW CLOTHES as told from the perspective of various court members and townspeople. The threads of the story are held together by a moth (illustrated by Quentin Blake) who flutters around the kingdom acting, if you’ll pardon the expression, as a fly on the wall letting the reader in on the various schemes and machinations behind the Emperor’s eventual humiliation.

So, each character (celebrity) gets a spread and each spread is given to an illustrator, themselves a celebrity of the children’s book illustration world. I mean look at that line-up! It’s a who’s-who of the then heaviest hitters—headliners at your local Bookstop, Borders, Coles, or Waldenbooks.

Sabrina, JTT and Stormin’ Norman make this the most 90s line-up ever.

So I’m flipping through the book and I’m instantly struck by two things: man, did illustration have a “look” back then and, boy, do I ever miss it!

Peter de Sève
Mark Teague
Steve Johnson & Lou Fancher
Daniel Adel
S. Saelig Gallagher
William Joyce

Thinking about how so many books from the 90s had that painterly look made me wonder which media dominated illustration at various times. It’s hardly a scientific survey, but I’d break it down like this:

DECADEMEDIA
70sink/ink and watercolor
80scolored pencil
90soil pastel/oils
00sgouache
10sdigital gouache/Procreate
20s???

We’re only three years into this decade so maybe it’s too early to call it, but I expected to see a turn towards silkscreen and risography. Sure, I’m a zine fan and it was probably more than a little bit of wishful thinking but I remember rubbing my hands together when Joohee Yoon’s THE TIGER WHO WOULD BE KING (2015) came out and thinking, “Oh man! Here we go!!!”

JOOHEE YOON, SHOW US THE WAY!!!
My face when risography didn’t become the next dominant style.

Maybe it’s too gritty, indie, or artsy but I don’t think silkscreen/risograph is making headway as a dominant style for the 20s. That’s okay, I’m used to being wrong (I thought pencil was going to take over the 10s solely on the incredible appeal of Benjamin Chaud and Isabelle Arsenault’s works and it didn’t). Digital gouache, which some might call the “Procreate” style, stole the show. You see a lot of it and I think it’s poised to stick around for a while. To be clear, I’m not throwing any shade at those works! I have a fondness the style, it pairs really well with humor and a mid-century modern design sensibility. I will say, though, that I think few people do it as well as the OG (Original Gerald).

Gerald McBoing Boing (1951)

I’m interested to know what you think. Do you agree with my breakdown above? Have I overlooked an entire style or maybe missed the boat entirely? Hit me up in the comments. For now, I’m off like the the Moth, to go grab a late lunch. See ya!

Master of this style. Remind me to do a Quentin Blake post.

UPDATE: To clear up a question from the comments: The Gerald Mc Boing Boing comparison was in reference to the style, rather than the medium. A better way to put it might be to say gouache/digital gouache looks really good with cartoonier characters. A lot of animators working in the early part of the 2000s were drawing inspiration from artists like Mary Blair. Gouache was getting a lot of play in Pixar concept art, for example. And given that there’s always some cross-pollination between animators and illustrators, it’s probably inevitable it would make its way into picture books.

left: I CAN FLY (Blair 1950), right: AN UNLIKELY ADVENTURE (Chou 2020)

#PBwithJ: THE EMPEROR’S NEW CLOTHES (1998) Read More »

Scroll to Top